A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed into a hugely publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development works at the location on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a business director respectively, search for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up people. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their preparing permission by building a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central for the dispute, therefore places are subject matter to stringent controls underneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, that's partly crafted, is in the correct place. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their look at, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-significant drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture which has because become emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Collect Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Occasions described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become Probably the most placing descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were covered intimately through the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt building pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical moment while in the lawful timeline.
Within the core of the dispute is usually a disagreement above boundaries, scheduling Rene Collier compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was authorised and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, continues to be described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their very long-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by professional guidance and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute about construction of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as significantly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly distinct professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of midsection-large h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Occasions are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling disorders. Nonetheless the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to live together with one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre from the dispute stands partially designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.